According to Chairperson Lipnic, the answer is mostly “no.” From Employment Law 360:
Broadly speaking, Lipnic said that she and her colleagues will remain committed to the EEOC’s central mission of enforcing anti-discrimination laws, but noted that its emphasis may be altered slightly under the Trump administration, which has emphasized job growth as a priority, to collaborate more with employers.
“I am committed to the mission of the agency,” Lipnic said. “But it is a new day [under the Trump administration] and to the extent where we can help foster employment opportunities and economic growth, that is something we should be focused on.” …
Lipnic said that the agency’s enforcement priorities that were outlined in its recently issued strategic enforcement plan … for 2017-2021 will largely remain the same.
Lipnic made clear on Thursday that she voted against the modification, but noted that she was the only current commissioner who did so. She added that the revised EEO-1 forms are an example of a regulation that “would fall squarely under” the direction outlined by Trump that agencies rethink the regulations they have on the books.
“Overall, there needs to be a re-evaluation of the costs and benefits,” Lipnic said.
Federal agencies are like the weather. If you don’t like it, just wait, it will change. With the weather, it’s based on atmospheric pressures and the rotation of the Earth around the Sun. With federal agencies, it based on the political party holding power in the White House. In other words, despite Chairperson Lipnic’s hedging against sweeping changes, expect business friendly regulatory rollbacks at the EEOC, NLRB, and DOL over the next four years.
This post originally appeared on the Ohio Employer’s Law Blog, and was written by Jon Hyman, Partner, Meyers, Roman, Friedberg & Lewis. Jon can be reached at via email at firstname.lastname@example.org, via telephone at 216-831-0042, on LinkedIn, and on Twitter.